Why You’re Spending Too Much on Legal Counsel

In the fast-moving world of payments regulation - from PSD3 and AMLD6 to evolving KYC, PCI DSS, and DORA - compliance teams are under pressure to stay ahead of change. The instinct for many is to rely on top-tier legal counsel for proactive regulatory monitoring. After all, legal experts provide invaluable guidance, helping organisations navigate complex frameworks and avoid costly missteps.

But there’s a catch: relying heavily on external counsel comes with a hidden cost. Top-tier law firms charge unpredictable fees for ad-hoc advice and ongoing monitoring. For smaller or scaling teams, repeated engagements can quickly erode budgets. What starts as a seemingly efficient solution can rapidly become unsustainable, diverting resources away from strategic initiatives such as automation, process optimisation, and control enhancement.

Outsourcing core compliance oversight may offer short-term convenience, but it often introduces operational friction. Each engagement requires briefing, review, and follow-up, slowing internal decision-making. Teams end up reacting to legal advice rather than proactively shaping compliance strategy. The result is a reactive cycle that consumes both time and money, leaving little room for initiatives that truly drive business growth.

Forward-thinking teams are recognising that the real solution isn’t just about reducing legal spend—it’s about building internal, technology-driven compliance capabilities. By investing in automated, in-house solutions, organisations gain three critical advantages: cost control, agility, and long-term resilience.

Cost Control Through Automation

Many repetitive compliance tasks—regulatory monitoring, reporting, transaction screening—can be automated. Automation reduces dependency on external counsel for routine updates, enabling teams to track changes in PSD3, AMLD6, KYC, PCI DSS, and DORA efficiently and continuously. This translates directly into budget savings while freeing staff to focus on higher-value, strategic activities.

Agility in a Rapidly Evolving Regulatory Landscape

Internalising compliance oversight allows organisations to respond immediately to regulatory developments without waiting for external advice or negotiating hourly fees. This agility is particularly crucial in payments regulation, where new rules and interpretations emerge rapidly. Teams that manage compliance internally can implement changes proactively, reducing risk and maintaining a competitive edge.

Long-Term Resilience

Building internal capabilities also strengthens institutional knowledge. Over time, teams develop expertise that is embedded within the organisation, not outsourced to external counsel. This creates a self-sustaining compliance function that scales with the business. Instead of continually paying for reactive legal support, organisations invest in systems and skills that provide predictable, long-term value.

The shift from outsourcing to internal, technology-enabled compliance is more than a cost-saving exercise. It transforms compliance from a reactive, resource-intensive activity into a strategic growth enabler. By reducing reliance on external counsel, organisations can allocate resources to innovation, control optimisation, and process improvement. Compliance becomes a driver of efficiency and operational excellence rather than a financial drain.

Breaking Free from the Cost Trap

The message is clear: legal advice is valuable, but outsourcing core compliance oversight can be expensive, inefficient, and slow. Top-tier law firms excel in specialised guidance, but repeated engagements for monitoring and ad-hoc tasks quickly accumulate costs that smaller teams cannot sustain.

Best-in-class compliance teams are responding by investing in automated, in-house solutions. This approach reduces the unpredictability of legal fees, enhances operational efficiency, and positions compliance as a strategic asset rather than a cost centre. By breaking free from the cost trap, organisations gain control over spend, improve responsiveness, and build a foundation for long-term resilience in an increasingly complex regulatory environment.

In a world of fast-evolving payments regulation, the smartest choice isn’t simply to pay more for legal counsel - it’s to empower your team with internal capabilities that work smarter, stay ahead, and reduce risk.

‍

Is legal counsel causing a lag?

It’s time for a smarter approach. Download your handy 2 pager to discover how best practice teams bring the regulatory responsibility in-house to rescue costs and increase control.

‍